Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 00:41
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$198 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 226 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 686 66% 542 Pts	64-Core 838 52% 838 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB; msi 1080 ti armor oc CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 186 Parallax 164 140% 174 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 164 Splatting 116 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 237 151 148 192 177 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 344 Mixed 312 SusWrite 189 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 46 160% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 323 239% 315 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 124%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 16GB free Firmware: 1.3.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 80 85 87 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 158 Write 93.8 Mixed 124 SusWrite 84.3 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 29.4 115% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 92.8 DQ Mixed 97.6 76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 61%
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419 137 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 67GB free Firmware: 5.0.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 161 166 163 161 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.9% Above average	Read 175 Write 166 Mixed 164 SusWrite 158 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 24.8 108% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 98.3 100% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 92%
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 128GB 720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 32GB free Firmware: AGYA0201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 160 172 173 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 157 Write 144 Mixed 138 SusWrite 161 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 12.5 62% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 11.9 DQ Write 45.8 DQ Mixed 19.4 18% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 97GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 65 65 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 65 Write 61.5 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 63.8 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 44%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98 3,967 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 379GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 152 157 157 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 136 Write 138 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 154 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 100%
Seagate GoFlex Cable 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 64GB free, PID 5170 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 97 78 86 66 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	Read 149 Write 145 Mixed 141 SusWrite 79.2 171% 128 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 15.1 1,284% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 37.8 DQ Mixed 18.5 1,981% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$207 4,097 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 18.4 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,931x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	540x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	268x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	479x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	224x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16