MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 02:39
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 396
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 62
57% 67.3 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 68.4
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 95 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 321
Write 108
Mixed 166
SusWrite 98.1
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 33.3
123% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 129
94% 121 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 87%
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB
12GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 186
Write 44.8
Mixed 70
SusWrite 46.6
19% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17.1
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 53.5
45% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 37%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
145GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 54 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 52
Mixed 40
SusWrite 53
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31%
Great: 44%
Freecom 1TB
784GB free, PID fc9f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.1
52% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 42%
Freecom 1TB
67GB free, PID fc9f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 67
Write 44
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 67.3
73% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback