Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 22:02
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
SC Int 101
SC Float 111
SC Mixed 106
85% 106 Pts
QC Int 401
QC Float 427
QC Mixed 405
93% 411 Pts
MC Int 1,088
MC Float 1,152
MC Mixed 1,110
167% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.3% Average
Lighting 130
Reflection 113
Parallax 123
40% 122 fps
MRender 82.4
Gravity 120
Splatting 81.3
41% 94.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$78
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 231 232 232 229 230 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 486
Mixed 384
SusWrite 258
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 54.9
184% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 252
186% 245 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$50
136GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 73.8
Write 82.3
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 69.9
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$72
389GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 90 91 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 88.4
Mixed 79
SusWrite 91.2
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 153 156 157 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 74.1
Write 66.8
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 155
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 115%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$11
16GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 140
Write 50
Mixed 73
SusWrite 50.3
93% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.1
196% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D32BEEAK.K8FB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $987
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $349Nvidia GTX 1070 $358Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback