PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100625 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 01 '18 at 11:12 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 860-$339
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 850E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 107 109 108 104 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
15GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 62 57 58 78 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
501GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 54 60 63 64 60 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 160 161 159 160 156 MB/s
|
80%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
30GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 22x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 21x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 8x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $475 |