Toshiba SATELLITE C855-21Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-21Z  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 15:11
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 112
55% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.28
5% 6.12 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 5.87
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 78 80 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 101
SusWrite 81.4
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 16.2
64% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 93.1
74% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
727GB free
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 71 69 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 71.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 72.1
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 59%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 4.9 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 11.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10
16% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
37% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback