| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite A200 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA ISKAA |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080828 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '18 at 19:55 |
| Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
37.5%
Below average
|
33% 44.4 Pts
|
6% 44.7 Pts
|
3% 45.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Toshiba(1179 FF00) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
0% 0.68 fps
|
1% 0.77 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.2%
Very poor
|
10% 3.4 GB/s
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite A200 Builds (Compare 26 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite A200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples | 15x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples | 7x |
| GeForce Go 7300NvidiaBench 0%, 116 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $150 |