HP ProBook 6560b

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 6560b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1619
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 17:00
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 85.6
50% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 154
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 172
12% 172 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723225A7A364 250GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECBOA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 82.5
Write 80
Mixed 71.7
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.37
88% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 64GB-$104
56GB free, PID 162b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 20.2
Mixed 15.6
26% 23 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.23
36% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProBook 6560b Builds (Compare 872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6560b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $122
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback