HP Presario C700 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario C700 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D9
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100329
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 30.2
17% 25.1 Pts
4-Core 30.1
8-Core 30.8
4% 30.5 Pts
64-Core 29.9
2% 29.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30D9)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.13%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 238
Write 106
Mixed 97.9
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 8.51
4K Mixed 7.75
36% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 8.76
11% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback