Mousecomputer/g81 H81M-D3V-JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mousecomputer/g81 H81M-D3V-JP (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer H81M-D3V-JP
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '18 at 18:29
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 175 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 250 35% 258 Pts	64-Core 332 21% 332 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Lighting 74.6 Reflection 77.7 Parallax 74 61% 75.4 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 71 Splatting 73 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
USB3.0 3TB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 763GB free Firmware: 0101 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 161 Mixed 162 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.23 70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 109%
USB3.0 2TB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 129GB free Firmware: 0101 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 105 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.57 101% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 115 115 17193042116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 890 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17682 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 889 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 891 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 891 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 176094117914 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.7% Good	Read 118 Write 115 Mixed 110 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.15 46% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AM2L16BC8R2-B0QS 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.7% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D3V-JP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Mousecomputer/g81 H81M-D3V-JP

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GBHynixBench 37%, 62 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Mousecomputer/g81 H81M-D3V-JP

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Mousecomputer/g81 H81M-D3V-JP

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)