Clevo W7x0S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo W7x0S  (all builds)
Motherboardclevo W7x0S
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 48.1
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 64
31% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 63.7
8-Core 65.5
9% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 66.4
4% 66.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM251HI 250GB-$50
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 59.3
Mixed 32.2
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 47%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
12GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 4.85
Mixed 7.46
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.22
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.67
81% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.5
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback