Today's hottest deals

Olidata G31-M7 TE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOlidata G31-M7 TE  (all builds)
MotherboardOLIDATA G31-M7 TE
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 15:15
Run Duration1211 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 66.5
38% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 68.2
8-Core 67.6
9% 67.9 Pts
64-Core 68.3
4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 93.3
Mixed 39.3
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.41
95% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Generic Flash Udisk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Read 0.95
Write 0.75
Mixed 0.77
1% 0.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
2% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback