PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Inspiron 580 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 033FF6 |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100326 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '18 at 17:31 |
Run Duration | 400 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate STM3250318AS 250GB
220GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
51.7%
Above average
|
||||
62.8%
Good
|
||||
7.96%
Terrible
|
||||
WDC WD2500BEVT-2 250GB
19GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate External Drive 320GB
9GB free, PID 0503
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 107x |
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 92x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 79x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 78x |
GeForce 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,147 samples | 28x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $138 |