Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 540 293 User benchmarks, average bench 26% U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 19.1 2-Core 21 18% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 8.1 8-Core 20.2 2% 14.2 Pts	64-Core 13.7 1% 13.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30D8) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM800 TH 64GB 438 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM24D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3249 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 984 (AF) Unknown 98 98 1 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 89 89 654 (B2) Unknown 78 78 13 (B3) Unknown 91 91 163 (B4) Unknown 91 91 1757 (B5) Unknown 99 99 1 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E8) Unknown 78 78 47 (E9) Unknown 98 98 66398859	17.5% Very poor	Read 174 Write 57.7 Mixed 90.6 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 8.99 4K Write 7.33 4K Mixed 4.75 24% 7.02 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.55% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.55% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16