Asus M4A88TD-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A88TD-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100415
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 17:58
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B35 354 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 83.7 41% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 131 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 12.9 12% 13 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.8 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5602647 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 97444218017653 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1414 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 133 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 40 43 47247458344 (C2) HDA temperature 40 43 47247458344 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5602647 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5602647 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5602647 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 98784247809 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10018 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7085 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7085 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6179 (F4) Unknown 98 98 5242957	39.3% Below average	Read 270 Write 124 Mixed 158 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 11.1 62% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 90.3 DQ Mixed 13.7 24% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 294GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 170 2350 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 528 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2725 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2823 (C2) HDA temperature 105 102 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.1% Excellent	Read 174 Write 106 Mixed 116 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.15 67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 30GB free Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 87 36404434 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9104 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 210255053 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31566 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 8097 (BB) vendor-specific 60 60 40 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 56 50 739377196 (C2) HDA temperature 44 50 60129542188 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 72 61 175474409 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	53.7% Above average	Read 91.6 Write 95.7 Mixed 59.8 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.27 73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A88TD-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	5x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	5x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	2x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x

SSD
PM871 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 71%, 2,429 samples	2x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	2x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16