Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Fusion Elite P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Fusion Elite P  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B650-PLUS
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '24 at 10:56
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G-$170
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 53.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 334
95% 187 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,005
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,325
82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.1% Average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 65.3
40% 45.4 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 69.5
44% 50.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcspecialist PCS3480 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 113 987 2005 1996 1989 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 1,199
379% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 56.9
188% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 922
711% 979 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 248%
Great: 343%
Pcspecialist PCS3480 1TB
704GB free
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1950 2048 2044 2002 250 272 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 2,249
Mixed 1,812
SusWrite 1,428
412% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 64.3
215% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 953
748% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 275%
Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 51.6
159% 55.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 23.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 141%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 533 334 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28BA ASUS VG289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback