Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120420
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 327 43% 325 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91); rx 560aero itx-4g CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 34 22% 29.6 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 32.5 24% 29 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2CT080A4 80GB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 335u Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -126572686197652 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3323 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 89 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 374188 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 374188 (F2) Unknown 100 100 298836 (F9) Unknown 100 100 13398	42.9% Average	Read 267 Write 97.2 Mixed 155 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 10.9 82% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 11.1 23% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 76%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 154 Write 168 Mixed 136 197% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.27 104% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 176GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 135 Write 125 Mixed 60.3 129% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.22 80% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 61%
Seagate Desktop 1.5TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 108GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 37 Mixed 9.93 33% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.16 18% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL KHX1866C10D3/8G 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $223

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16