Sony VPCSB1V9R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSony VPCSB1V9R  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 07 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 133
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 181
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sony(104D 907B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.862.4.4000
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 261
Write 101
Mixed 144
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 10.9
44% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 45.7
56% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback