HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

Gaming 24%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 21%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 09:35
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 175
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 520
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 836B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 30.9
24% 30.4 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 20
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 836B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 103 100 108 80 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 1,121
Write 130
Mixed 189
SusWrite 93.8
82% 383 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 188
158% 239 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93%
Great: 193%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 116 117 77 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 125
Write 120
Mixed 27
SusWrite 108
68% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Kingston XS1000 1TB
638GB free, PID 1780
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 37 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 58.2
Write 28.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 35.8
49% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 10.3
649% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 23.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 18% 28 168 3 60 12.6" 1280 720 AGO6201
Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback