Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-fd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BB8
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 21:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 328
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BB8) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.3
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 3.1
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 946 1040 1092 1176 649 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,111
Mixed 1,066
SusWrite 965
249% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 68.3
206% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 720
537% 716 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 207%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 2 0 15.5" 1280 720 AUO5799
Typical Laptop 15-fd0xxx Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15-fd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback