Today's hottest deals

Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q170M-C  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$147
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 194
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 561
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6181) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 138
Parallax 129
103% 131 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 116
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 418 418 432 433 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 380
Write 370
Mixed 207
SusWrite 422
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 31.9
112% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 156
136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 105%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 149 152 152 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 150
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 JPVT-16A1YT0 1TB
119GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 40 39 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.5% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 38.2
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 38.2
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 10G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 44% 36 529 433 75 23.8" 1920 1009 GSM5BB2 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback