Today's hottest deals

Default X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics379% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemDefault X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$470
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 213
2-Core 418
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 832
8-Core 1630
146% 1,231 Pts
64-Core 3,672
227% 3,672 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,735
Asus(1043 88F1) ≥ 4GB; rog geforce rtx 4090
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
379% Outstanding
Lighting 603
Reflection 581
Parallax 780
492% 655 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 578
Splatting 279
361% 464 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 379%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$240
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 79.5
Write 44.2
Mixed 51.2
13% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
3% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
155% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 53.2
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 50
SC Write 64.3
SC Mixed 51.6
158% 55.3 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 155%
Great: 300%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 50 34.1" 1280 720 DELA148 Dell AW3420DW
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 220%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO

System: Default X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback