Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 162
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 322
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 24.2
21% 24.9 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 17.5
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 101 104 101 98 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 91.5
Write 172
Mixed 146
SusWrite 104
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 27.9
97% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 134
110% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
63GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 3.7 1.3 0.9 3.9 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 2.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.8
3% 4.1 MB/s
4K Read 106
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4,404% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HM501IX 500GB
148GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 41 41 42 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 100
Write 16.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 39.1
50% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A/BR Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback