Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 03:48
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 466
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 396
Mixed 410
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 42.4
137% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 78.3
88% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
311GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Intel 510 Series 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: PWG4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 220
Write 172
Mixed 178
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 9.8
45% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 10.2
12% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 174
Mixed 162
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
HP Desktop HD BD07 2TB
885GB free, PID bd07
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 23.2
Mixed 12.5
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback