Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 16:07
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 120
53% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 251
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780 4GB
Asus(1043 84CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 355.82
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 59.9
38% 51.1 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 45
Splatting 46.2
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EZ LINK T34 256GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 467
Write 212
Mixed 277
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 21.9
98% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 27.4
60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 87%
Ezlink P anzer-H 256GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Read 489
Write 163
Mixed 177
60% 276 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 28.7
112% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 41.2
62% 121 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 174
Write 100
Mixed 118
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 4.77
4K Mixed 0.29
142% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 157
Mixed 138
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback