Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FE
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 21:52
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 94.2
46% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 147
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FE) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.1701.1001
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 5.25
5% 7.11 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 1
Splatting 8.96
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 94.9
Mixed 104
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.24
73% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 3.33
Mixed 5.37
10% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.47
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.008
13% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback