Today's hottest deals

Emachines ET1331G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmachines ET1331G  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines MCP61PM-GM
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090813
Uptime18 Days
Run DateNov 11 '17 at 08:27
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 235e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 78.1
42% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 78.4
8-Core 79.2
10% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 77.8
5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.1
Write 83.1
Mixed 78.2
61% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.74% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 14
Mixed 13.9
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
500GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 14.8
Mixed 11.4
17% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 50%
ST316002 3A 160GB
59GB free, PID 2506
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.25% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 14.5
Mixed 8.74
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.31
44% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 9%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
14GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 14.3
Write 14.1
Mixed 14.5
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.41
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
400, 400, 400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1331G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1331G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback