Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus F50Sf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus F50Sf (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON F50Sf
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090609
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '17 at 13:54
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 18.6 23% 30 Pts	4-Core 40.3 8-Core 40.3 5% 40.3 Pts	64-Core 64.5 4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M 962 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 2039) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.79 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 653GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX1P2C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1834 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1335 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3494 (0A) Spinup retry count 126 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1307 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1582 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 38 507696709683 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 52 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3604535 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 15782 (C2) HDA temperature 49 38 507696709683 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	36.5% Below average	Read 48.9 Write 78.4 Mixed 38.8 41% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.09 26% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 62%
takeMS Colorline 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.95% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 3.74 Mixed 4.39 8% 8.18 MB/s	4K Read 3.17 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.005 12% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.87% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F50Sf Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Asus F50Sf

CPU
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 220MNvidiaBench 2%, 962 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Asus F50Sf

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus F50Sf

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)