Fujitsu AMILO Pi 3540

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu AMILO Pi 3540 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU F47
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '17 at 09:42
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 70.9 37% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 71.6 10% 71.2 Pts	64-Core 68.2 4% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS 2,044 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1137) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 327.2 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.79 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.04 1% 1.41 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150 2,567 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2807 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1997 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 31 (AE) Unknown 100 100 49 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 103 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 262 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7619182611 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8988099770	19.3% Very poor	Read 240 Write 43.8 Mixed 51.9 24% 112 MB/s	4K Read 9.09 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 4.55 24% 7.18 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 54%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35 11,469 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 338GB free Firmware: SD23 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 159263114 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 211939602 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19532 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6065 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 253 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 46 605421604 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 34 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 8 8 185791 (C2) HDA temperature 36 54 30064771108 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 42 159263114 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	46.9% Average	Read 81.6 Write 82 Mixed 78.4 61% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.24 67% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 133GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 111 Write 120 Mixed 74.3 129% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 6.64 4K Mixed 0.61 250% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu AMILO Pi 3540

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)