Hpqoem 1633____

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardHpqoem 1633____  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime310.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 17:57
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
SC Int 39.1
SC Float 24.9
SC Mixed 30.5
25% 31.5 Pts
QC Int 123
QC Float 74.3
QC Mixed 94.1
22% 97 Pts
MC Int 150
MC Float 93
MC Mixed 114
18% 119 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
HP(103C 1633) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.2
2% 8.37 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.6
2% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$75
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 98
Mixed 92.9
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.19
54% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$30
29GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 29.9
Write 29.1
Mixed 23.9
35% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.44
4K Write 4.75
4K Mixed 2.63
268% 3.94 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 92%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 1633____ Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

Motherboard: Hpqoem 1633____

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $319Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback