Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 15.1 2-Core 33.5 28% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 53 7% 50.4 Pts	64-Core 49.1 3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1027 2014) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 1% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.5% Poor	Read 161 Write 103 Mixed 124 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 6.91 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 4.85 22% 7.57 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 4.72 9% 17.9 MB/s

Generic USB SD Reader 2GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6332 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Read 10.3 Write 4.66 Mixed 6.39 8% 7.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 15% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.6 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16