Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP900X3D-A01US
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 23:22
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2537M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 68.5
43% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 92.6
8-Core 93.1
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.76 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 SMG2 126GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 444
Write 69.8
Mixed 172
49% 229 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 8.64
4K Mixed 5.29
30% 8.72 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 6.59
DQ Mixed 6.16
9% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 46%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
40GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 127
Write 34.8
Mixed 46.8
72% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.34
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 37%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 4.05
Mixed 7.27
10% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 2.98
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.006
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback