Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '15 at 12:14
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 155
57% 122 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 66.4
51% 65.9 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 53.9
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 513
Write 315
Mixed 307
83% 378 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 19.7
80% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 72.6
88% 154 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 116%
Asrock RAM Disk 10GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
496GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 85.9
Mixed 23.1
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.37
88% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
434GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 73.7
Write 80.4
Mixed 66.2
55% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.37
89% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
197GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 75.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 65.5
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.36
104% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 69%
Generic USB CF Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 7.32
Mixed 10.6
16% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.72
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.82
80% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback