PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190425 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 04 '22 at 20:37 |
Run Duration | 335 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 80 19 24 23 27 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
813GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 181 182 185 176 182 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $646 |