Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '22 at 21:29
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 224 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 578 66% 513 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 53.3 Parallax 45.1 28% 44.4 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 46.6 Splatting 18.8 27% 35.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 359 425 450 20 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 353 Write 430 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 216 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 6.3 55% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 17.2 14% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 96%
Seagate Portable 1TB 4,264 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 912GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 119 118 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 74.7 Write 113 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 119 73% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 68%
Seagate Portable 1.5TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 682GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 43 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32 Write 39.1 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 42.1 45% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH64AA# 1x8GB 529 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16