Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	47.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 214 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 699 63% 530 Pts	64-Core 1,230 76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 15.3 14% 17.4 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 12.3 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 159 166 168 151 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62% Good	Read 432 Write 234 Mixed 215 SusWrite 171 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 22.3 79% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 106 107% 182 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 166GB free Firmware: MN6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 81 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 72 Write 72.7 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 75 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 667GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 87 86 75 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 85.2 Write 95.9 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 80.6 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free Firmware: CC37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 73 74 65 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 74.8 Write 74.6 Mixed 51 SusWrite 69 50% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 667GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 70 74 73 63 58 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 72 Write 72.4 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 69.2 94% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 82 82 73 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 65 Write 60.6 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 76.5 86% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 48% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB 4,475 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 2627 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 14 14 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 31.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 12.8 33% 25 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 64%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB 711 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 2626 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 12.9 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 152% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 62%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 184GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 40 41 37 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 26.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 37.8 43% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 19%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 31.1 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 13.1 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 5,791 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.9% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 22.5 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,434x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	231x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)