Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 13:16
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 369
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
49.3% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 58.7
49% 60.6 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 58.3
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 65 23 65 28 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 426
Write 365
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 89.8
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
198GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 113 111 112 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 110
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
167GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 75 74 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 80.6
Write 82.9
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 73
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-069.A00LF 99U5584-014.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback