Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2010-$40 3,290 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 91.4 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 141 20% 146 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23% Poor	Lighting 28.5 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 36.8 23% 34.4 fps	MRender 31.5 Gravity 26.5 Splatting 25.9 23% 28 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2 Serise 120GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 80 63 61 64 62 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.3% Below average	Read 250 Write 200 Mixed 196 SusWrite 81.7 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 9.9 57% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 17.5 44% 90 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	165x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	50x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16