Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TS11HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV50_HR
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '22 at 11:40
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 127 56% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 179 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0511) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 250G 250GB 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401100RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 446 Write 406 Mixed 237 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 27.4 94% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 201 181% 276 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 105%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 25GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 15 16 16 15 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 23 Mixed 15 SusWrite 14.7 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 70% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 28%
Generic Mass-Storage 513GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 452GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.7 8.6 9 8.6 8.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.2% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 15.5 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 8.9 19% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.6 112% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.2% Great: 12%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.3 13 10 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 15 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 11.7 21% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.1 138% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.8 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	48x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	35x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	32x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	134x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	33x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	19x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GBGigabyteBench 71%, 3,461 samples	4x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	17x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 888 samples	12x
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350