Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$300 588,541 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 138 2-Core 244 93% 159 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 723 76% 597 Pts	64-Core 732 49% 732 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230 209,463 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.1% Good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 118 Parallax 70.2 74% 93.2 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 80.6 Splatting 73 63% 72.8 fps
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$258 14,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 376 364 351 357 345 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 419 Mixed 306 SusWrite 362 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 44.9 169% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 152 167% 282 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 117%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 75GB free Firmware: 3H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 307 308 309 308 309 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 455 Mixed 394 SusWrite 321 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 65.1 223% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB 26,467 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3091 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 27.9 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 29.7 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 53.7 75% 53.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2402 24G2WG3-

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 6,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $300Bench 83%, 588,541 samples	3,406x
Core i5-6600KIntel $215Bench 79%, 351,967 samples	1,218x
Core i7-7700KIntel $379Bench 86%, 565,683 samples	533x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,234,782 samples	990x
GTX 1080Nvidia $500Bench 105%, 915,325 samples	719x
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 832,260 samples	507x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 104%, 849,566 samples	439x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $140Bench 110%, 710,750 samples	387x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 594,660 samples	170x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $72Bench 82%, 576,174 samples	388x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 85%, 39,021 samples	261x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 598,699 samples	238x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16