Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 184 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 456 48% 386 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.99 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.01% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 6.6 6% 7.67 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 7 6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.01% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 423 229 206 204 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 469 Write 447 Mixed 394 SusWrite 282 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 36.7 118% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 368 277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 133%
WD Elements 2621 4TB 1,693 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 32.1 Write 26 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 20.4 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 62%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16.6 Write 14.7 Mixed 6.7 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 95GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 13 15 17 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 28.1 Write 0.7 SusWrite 15.6 15% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16