Lenovo 4236Q23

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 31% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4236Q23 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 4236Q23
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180604
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	CYP-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 38.6 30% 40.3 Pts	4-Core 53.2 8-Core 52.2 7% 52.7 Pts	64-Core 51.7 3% 51.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 252 308 311 307 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 413 Write 357 Mixed 338 SusWrite 312 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 21.8 71% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 82.2 DQ Write 72.2 DQ Mixed 75.9 57% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 83GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 60 61 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 55.2 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 59.9 37% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 9.1 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4236Q23 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4236Q23

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	13x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	1x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
512GB X6 512GBMaxsunBench 73%, 60 samples	3x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 117 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16