Asus M5A97 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 124 56% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 207 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 1955) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 36.5 Parallax 29.6 27% 33.1 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 27.7 25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 359 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 321 32 165 113 52 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 156 Write 105 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 158 29% 127 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 9.2 41% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 8.6 DQ Mixed 13 10% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 411GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 108 106 104 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 67.7 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 108 64% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 8GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 78.4 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 0.7 13% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 PRO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 PRO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	29x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	18x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	49x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	40x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16