PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P6T (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090519 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '21 at 15:14 |
Run Duration | 292 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0446) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 114 115 98 110 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
217GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 72 74 75 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
529GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 70 72 72 74 72 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
245GB free
Firmware: PC4OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 72 74 75 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
233GB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 81 81 85 83 MB/s
|
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
297GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 70 72 72 74 72 MB/s
|
48.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 135 135 136 138 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23% | 9% | 81 | 85 | 53 | 60 | 27.2" | 3840 2160 | GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 566x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 144x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 72x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 78x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 50x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $318 |