| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 19 '21 at 09:20 |
| Run Duration | 254 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
85% 151 Pts
|
66% 529 Pts
|
40% 647 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.3%
Average
|
43% 50.5 fps
|
35% 43.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 33 26 13 12 7.4 MB/s
|
||||
|
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
31GB free
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 214 75 48 68 19 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
75% 333 MB/s
|
117% 49 MB/s
|
92% 185 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
74GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 108 102 104 107 MB/s
|
40.6%
Average
|
51% 69.4 MB/s
|
144% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
60.4%
Good
|
60% 21.1 GB/s
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
59% 67.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 49: 9R 0G 4B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49% | 34% | 38 | 108 | 6 | 144 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C |
History: Score 31: 2R 5G 6B | Score 50: 6R 5G 5B | Score 49: 9R 0G 4B
Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,067 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 3,192x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,498x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 460x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 721x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 560x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 509x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |