Acer Predator PH317-53

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator PH317-53 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Alphard_CFS
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 232 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 629 64% 518 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1342) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 96.4 Parallax 7.4 5% 36.7 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 1 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB 3,384 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXH7202Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 465 428 434 434 419 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,902 Write 2,105 Mixed 1,351 SusWrite 456 325% 1,453 MB/s	4K Read 51.5 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 65.9 215% 72.1 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 705 DQ Mixed 806 602% 803 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 178GB free Firmware: ACM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 70 77 73 70 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 72.2 Write 89.9 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 68.4 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB 17,072 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 23.7 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 33.9 SC Mixed 25.1 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	144	17.2"	1280 720	CMN175C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH317-53 Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-53

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	907x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	56x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	446x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	200x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	171x

SSD
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples	196x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	92x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 159%, 3,211 samples	90x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	337x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	193x
ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 540 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16