PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z210 CMT Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1587h |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110812 |
Uptime | 8.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '21 at 11:33 |
Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 46 52 50 49 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
17GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 37 29 32 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
399GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 167 177 178 176 MB/s
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37% | 16% | 91 | 250 | 158 | 60 | 22" | 1680 1050 | HWP2848 LA2205 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 22x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 17x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $97 |