Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '21 at 02:29
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 132
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 350
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 54.6
34% 45.2 fps
MRender 55.1
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 41.5
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 218 54 48 40 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 405
Write 330
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 94.1
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.1
43% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
67GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 78.1
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
146GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 98 99 102 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 85.1
Mixed 49
SusWrite 98.9
102% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 6R 9G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
67% 20% 126 230 129 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR023F P246HL
History: Score 42: 4R 4G 10B | Score 67: 6R 9G 10B
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback