PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 9100 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 05DN3X |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101021 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '21 at 03:56 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | GTM-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 162 1.8 78 46 58 MB/s
|
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
688GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 150 119 145 139 146 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.2%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 6 | 60 | 19.5" | 1280 720 | AOC2001 20E1W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 195x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 90x |
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $418 |