Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 03:56
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 67
2-Core 134
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 395
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 39.2
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 34.9
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 162 1.8 78 46 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.4% Poor
Read 240
Write 210
Mixed 210
SusWrite 91.7
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
688GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 150 119 145 139 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 163
Write 159
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 139
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 SUPERTALENT02 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 19.5" 1280 720 AOC2001 20E1W
Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $418
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback