Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 00:29
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$363
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 774
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,211
81% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3751) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 194
Parallax 186
164% 194 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 144
Splatting 129
121% 151 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 144%
Great: 166%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$155
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1023 618 656 483 422 440 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,289
Write 1801
Mixed 1,528
SusWrite 607
347% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 71.4
228% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 750
556% 743 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 233%
Great: 359%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
35GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,402
Write 982
Mixed 1,084
256% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 63.6
222% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 805
586% 773 MB/s
Poor: 186% Great: 315%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
36GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 82 78 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78.5
Write 50.9
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 79.1
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 98%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$109
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 11 31 31 32 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
213GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 62
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 89.6
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 37.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 32.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 40: 5R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 33% 42 267 219 165 31.5" 2560 1440 PNS0277 Pixio PX277P
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 22,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,165
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback