PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131127 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '21 at 04:39 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$37
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 250 267 262 267 278 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
361GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 144 144 144 144 144 MB/s
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.7 3.7 2.8 3.4 2.9 MB/s
|
5.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.2 MB/s
|
3.76%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 34.1" | 1280 720 | GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 42x |
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 34x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 26x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $163 |